Table 10

Oklahoma
Offenses Known to Law Enforcement
by State by Metropolitan and Nonmetropolitan Counties, 2005
[The data shown in this table do not reflect county totals but are the number of offenses reported by the sheriff's office or county police department.]

Metropolitan/Nonmetropolitan County Violent crime Murder and nonnegligent manslaughter Forcible rape Robbery Aggravated assault Property crime Burglary Larceny-theft Motor vehicle theft Arson1
Metropolitan Counties Canadian 22 0 2 1 19 93 40 39 14 1
Cleveland 42 1 11 1 29 371 150 182 39 5
Creek 85 0 11 3 71 574 226 315 33 14
Grady 45 0 1 1 43 294 112 154 28 4
Lincoln 21 0 1 0 20 274 122 113 39 0
Logan 28 0 4 1 23 285 105 165 15 2
McClain 24 1 2 0 21 116 39 57 20 4
Oklahoma 49 0 1 0 48 302 96 147 59 2
Okmulgee 26 1 4 4 17 281 121 132 28 10
Osage 29 3 6 0 20 514 176 288 50 6
Pawnee 45 0 6 1 38 187 67 92 28 9
Rogers 2 0 0 0 2 297 88 162 47 0
Sequoyah 66 1 3 1 61 365 132 212 21 2
Tulsa 225 3 11 28 183 1,171 328 687 156 9
Wagoner 31 0 2 2 27 348 125 155 68 5
Nonmetropolitan Counties Adair 21 0 7 0 14 205 74 94 37 14
Alfalfa 1 0 1 0 0 41 14 25 2 0
Atoka 6 0 0 1 5 101 32 59 10 3
Beaver 7 0 3 0 4 62 23 32 7 2
Beckham 13 0 1 1 11 67 27 32 8 2
Blaine 8 1 2 0 5 25 8 16 1 1
Bryan 69 1 14 3 51 338 162 138 38 0
Caddo 131 0 2 0 129 309 106 160 43 6
Carter 40 3 4 3 30 187 57 112 18 1
Cherokee 187 2 11 1 173 542 233 243 66 4
Choctaw 30 1 2 1 26 128 53 61 14 4
Cimarron 0 0 0 0 0 8 3 3 2 0
Coal 4 0 0 0 4 79 36 39 4 1
Cotton 4 0 0 1 3 25 11 12 2 1
Craig 17 0 1 1 15 130 60 61 9 2
Custer 9 0 0 0 9 61 21 39 1 0
Delaware 95 0 10 1 84 521 244 219 58 2
Dewey 2 0 0 0 2 25 5 15 5 1
Ellis 2 0 0 0 2 30 18 7 5 0
Garfield 12 0 4 0 8 77 27 43 7 1
Garvin 23 0 3 2 18 142 41 80 21 6
Grant 4 0 0 1 3 34 15 19 0 0
Greer 0 0 0 0 0 15 9 6 0 1
Harmon 2 0 0 0 2 6 1 5 0 0
Harper 0 0 0 0 0 9 2 5 2 0
Haskell 51 0 0 0 51 92 26 45 21 1
Hughes 6 0 2 1 3 91 25 51 15 2
Jackson 10 1 1 0 8 101 46 42 13 4
Jefferson 8 1 0 0 7 31 12 14 5 1
Johnston 35 0 3 0 32 69 41 19 9 0
Kay 17 0 3 1 13 189 64 115 10 5
Kingfisher 3 0 0 0 3 66 20 35 11 0
Kiowa 17 0 1 1 15 69 18 38 13 1
Latimer 48 0 3 0 45 69 27 36 6 1
Love 7 0 1 0 6 89 27 55 7 0
Major 3 0 1 0 2 8 5 2 1 0
Marshall 25 0 3 1 21 113 47 54 12 0
Mayes 31 2 3 5 21 291 91 178 22 0
McCurtain 122 1 10 2 109 450 185 187 78 6
McIntosh 10 0 2 3 5 307 111 165 31 7
Murray 5 0 0 0 5 57 25 27 5 0
Muskogee 42 0 7 1 34 248 110 104 34 19
Noble 2 0 0 0 2 89 30 54 5 2
Nowata 13 0 0 0 13 94 31 58 5 4
Okfuskee 4 1 0 0 3 67 23 28 16 4
Ottawa 36 1 3 2 30 203 88 76 39 2
Payne 31 0 12 0 19 217 89 117 11 17
Pittsburg 23 1 3 5 14 397 144 234 19 2
Pontotoc 19 1 2 1 15 144 47 85 12 5
Pottawatomie 71 0 7 4 60 615 226 329 60 14
Pushmataha 9 0 0 1 8 132 66 55 11 2
Roger Mills 5 0 0 0 5 57 9 48 0 1
Seminole 56 2 3 0 51 297 97 182 18 4
Stephens 44 0 3 1 40 158 54 97 7 0
Texas 12 0 1 0 11 50 22 25 3 0
Tillman 2 0 0 0 2 38 6 28 4 0
Washington 25 0 4 1 20 226 85 131 10 9
Washita 5 0 1 0 4 52 18 23 11 1
Woods 2 0 2 0 0 40 9 26 5 1
Woodward 5 1 0 0 4 101 41 55 5 1

Back to Top

Data Declaration

Provides the methodology used in constructing this table and other pertinent information about this table.